Pope Francis
has given hope to gays, unmarried couples and advocates of the Big Bang
theory. Now, he has endeared himself to dog lovers, animal-rights
activists and vegans.
Trying
to console a distraught little boy whose dog had died, Francis told him
in a recent public appearance on St. Peter’s Square that “paradise is
open to all of God’s creatures.” While it is unclear whether the pope’s
remarks helped soothe the child, they were welcomed by groups like the Humane Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals,
who saw them as a repudiation of conservative Catholic theology that
says animals cannot go to heaven because they have no souls.
“My
inbox got flooded,” said Christine Gutleben, senior director of faith
outreach at the Humane Society, the largest animal protection group in
the United States. “Almost immediately, everybody was talking about it.”
Charles Camosy,
an author and professor of Christian ethics at Fordham University, said
it was difficult to know precisely what Francis meant, since he spoke
“in pastoral language that is not really meant to be dissected by
academics.” But asked if the remarks had caused a new debate on whether
animals have souls, suffer and go to heaven, Mr. Camosy said, “In a
word: Absolutely.”
In
his relatively short tenure as leader of the world’s one billion Roman
Catholics since taking over from Benedict XVI, Francis, 77, has
repeatedly caused a stir among conservatives in the church. He has
suggested more lenient positions than his predecessor on issues like
homosexuality, single motherhood and unwed couples. So to some extent,
it was not a surprise that Francis, an Argentine Jesuit who took his
papal name from St. Francis of Assisi, the patron saint of animals,
would suggest to a saddened child that his lost pet had a place in the
afterlife.
Citing
biblical passages that assert that animals not only go to heaven, but
get along with one another when they get there, Francis was quoted by
the Italian news media as saying: “One day, we will see our animals
again in the eternity of Christ. Paradise is open to all of God’s
creatures.”
Theologians cautioned that Francis had spoken casually, not made a doctrinal statement.
The Rev. James Martin,
a Jesuit priest and editor at large of America, the Catholic magazine,
said he believed that Francis was at least asserting that “God loves and
Christ redeems all of creation,” even though conservative theologians
have said paradise is not for animals.
“He said paradise is open to all creatures,” Father Martin said. “That sounds pretty clear to me.”
The
question of whether animals go to heaven has been debated for much of
the church’s history. Pope Pius IX, who led the church from 1846 to
1878, longer than any other pope, strongly supported the doctrine that
dogs and other animals have no consciousness. He even sought to thwart
the founding of an Italian chapter of the Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals.
Pope
John Paul II appeared to reverse Pius in 1990 when he proclaimed that
animals do have souls and are “as near to God as men are.” But the
Vatican did not widely publicize his assertion, perhaps because it so
directly contradicted Pius, who was the first to declare the doctrine of
papal infallibility in 1854.
John
Paul’s successor, Benedict, seemed to emphatically reject his view in a
2008 sermon in which he asserted that when an animal dies, it “just
means the end of existence on earth.”
Ms.
Gutleben of the Humane Society said Francis’ apparent reversal of
Benedict’s view could be enormous. “If the pope did mean that all
animals go to heaven, then the implication is that animals have a soul,”
she said. “And if that’s true, then we ought to seriously consider how
we treat them. We have to admit that these are sentient beings, and they
mean something to God.”
Sarah Withrow King, director of Christian outreach and engagement at PETA,
one of the most activist anti-slaughterhouse groups, said the pope’s
remarks vindicated the biblical portrayal of heaven as peaceful and
loving, and could influence eating habits, moving Catholics away from
consuming meat — which she asserted had already been happening anyway.
“It’s a vegan world, life over death and peace between species,” she
said. “I’m not a Catholic historian, but PETA’s motto is that animals
aren’t ours, and Christians agree. Animals aren’t ours, they’re God’s.”
Whether
the pope’s remarks will prove to be a persuasive new reason not to eat
meat, a potentially worrisome development to the multibillion-dollar
beef, pork, poultry and seafood industries, remains unclear at best. But
they did cause discussion.
“As
on quite a few other things Pope Francis has said, his recent comments
on all animals going to heaven have been misinterpreted,” Dave Warner, a
spokesman for the National Pork Producers Council,
said in an email. “They certainly do not mean that slaughtering and
eating animals is a sin.” Mr. Warner quoted passages from Genesis that
say man is given “dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds
of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on earth.”
“While
that ‘dominion’ means use for human benefit, it also requires
stewardship — humane care and feeding — something all farmers who raise
animals practice every day of every year,” Mr. Warner said.
Father
Martin said he did not believe the pope’s remarks could be construed as
a comment on vegetarianism. But, he said, “he’s reminding us that all
creation is holy and that in his mind, paradise is open to all
creatures, and frankly, I agree with him.”
Laura Hobgood-Oster,
professor of religion and environmental studies at Southwestern
University in Georgetown, Tex., and an expert on the history of
dog-human interaction, said she believed that there would be a backlash
from religious conservatives, but that it would take time.
“The
Catholic Church has never been clear on this question; it’s all over
the place, because it begs so many other questions,” she said. “Where do
mosquitoes go, for God’s sake?”
I love this Pope, but I have to say I thought it was really sad, that he said dogs can go to Heaven, and in the same week announced that he wouldn't invite the Dalai Lama to Rome to participate in an important conference of spiritual leaders?!?!!!!
ReplyDelete....He didn't want to make the Chinese mad.......